However those tiny bikini's of her's are not flattering, particularly the bottoms, they are so minute in size, that they make everything in their vicinity exaggerated; the thighs, the hips and the butt, and of course the torso appears even longer then it is.
Still my dear ladies, just look at that lovely waistline, one that short torsoed gals could only fantasize about in their wildest dreams.
Posts
She looks really good! That waist is really attractive and definitely enviable.
ReplyDeleteBtw, I think Annalynne McCord, Kate Beckinsale and Audrina Patridge could make good post subjects as well.
my evidence for audrina
ReplyDeletehttp://www.denimblog.com/celebs/celebs-in-denim-audrina-patridge-in-paige-premium-denim-skinnies/
what do you guys think?
Kaysey
ReplyDeleteyou are right about Audrina, I do have her on my list of subjects for the blog, but I see her just as a reality star and not someone particularly enviable or confidence boosting. Therefor I will have her on here at some point further down the line, just not right now.
I am even sort of overwhelmed at the great response and suggestions from all the readers, and there is quite a page full of people that I am in the process of writing about.
Do you think Rachel is more disproportionate than Giada? I mean Giada is looks smaller or shorter - or is it just because of proportion? Short legs can make someone look shorter than they really are. But, Rachel's torso/shoulders just looks longer and wider than Giada.
ReplyDeleteWell it's hard to say but perhaps Giada is more disproportionate then Rachel. Both Rachel Bilson and Giada are apparently about 5'1 or 5'2.
ReplyDeleteI think Giada looks shorter, but in the picture of her from behind she looks more proportionate than the images of Rachel from behind on the beach. Rachel's long willowy body is always more striking to me than Giada's for some reason.
ReplyDeleteAnd every time I've seen Giada on the Today show, she's not much shorter than Natalie Morales and Ann Curry who are all quite tall I think. Even with heels, I don't see how she's just a little shorter than Natalie.
I wish we could take a poll :).
Well I could set up a poll. What would you want it to ask?
ReplyDeleteWhat about any poll comparing whatever two ladies you think makes a good comparison?
ReplyDeleteGiada and Rachel, Rachel and Kiera, Claire Danes and Kiera, Jessica Simpson and Hayden Panetierre, or Jessica versus Christina Ricci.
I guess my question was that I was curious to see who people thought was more disproportionate or who has proportionately shorter legs?
ReplyDeleteBecause while I feel like there are significant differences between some of ladies on here, some are quite similar regardless of height, or maybe sometimes the height makes it seem different? Maybe, it's just camera angles.
I am not in favor of any poll to determine who is supposedly more 'disproportionate'. Afterall, aren't we long torso'd, short legged ladies already self conscience about our so-called 'mis-shapen' bodies. This blog highlights the hollywood women who have our body shapes and yet are considered beautiful. Let's continue to honor short legs and give them the respect they deserve.
ReplyDeleteMarie
For some strange reason, blake lively to me looks to have short legs too...I just cant put my finger on it yet. Another one would be leighton meester. She has a short torso long legs. So does Rihanna...
ReplyDeleteI mean she has a long torso short legs. So does Rihanna, Lauren Conrad.....
ReplyDelete-Marie, I like your comment, you voiced your opinion beautifully, and you have made me reconsider. Well I am still not entirely decided on the polls, but I will think upon it a little longer.
ReplyDelete-Gossip Girl is one of my favorite shows, I never miss an episode, however I have not noticed the two leading girls to be disproportionate, and I look of course. Otherwise Jessica Szhor is on here already, while Taylor Momsen is insanely long legged.
I'm a chick. I have no idea why men worship long legs. But maybe that long distance from the ground makes women mysterious, because the distance makes pu*sy far from the ground? (I'm not joking! I'm trying to figure out why men love adore long legs). I mean, it looks like you can't have sex with them easily. So, long legs make women mysterious? Hmmm...
ReplyDeleteGross. I don't think you're a 'chick'.
ReplyDeleteHow much does the opinion of the opposite sex matter? Maybe, zero in the case of the individual above.
ReplyDeleteBut, seriously isn't this about what women think of themselves, and each individual as well.
If she is around 5'2, I would guess her inseam would be roughly 27 inches or so.
ReplyDeletewoow, everyone is saying their 5'1 or 5'2 ?? Im only 5'0 and my legs dont seem to be THAT short... or maybe they are... and i just havent noticed... oh dear..
ReplyDeleteProof that short legs are just as good as long ones. But I do agree, the bikini is not particularly flattering and would suit a more leggy boyish body type.
ReplyDelete